[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize

[Tobias Grosser]

On 06/21/2012 04:23 PM, Hal Finkel wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:03:46 +0200
> Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es>  wrote:
>
>> On 06/20/2012 11:07 PM, Hal Finkel wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:15:12 +0200
>>> Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02/05/2012 02:42 PM, Hal Finkel wrote:
>>>>> I think that it would be a good idea to have a buildbot set up to
>>>>> run the test suite with -vectorize. Could one of the existing
>>>>> machines do this also?
>>>>
>>>> It took some time, but we have this now:
>>>>
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize
>>>>
>>>> The first run shows that there are a couple of test-suite failures
>>>> with the vectorizer:
>>>>
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/108/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/tests.FAIL
>>>>
>>>> Hal, interested to take a look?
>>>
>>> If I'm looking at this correctly, there are now no failures.
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/220/steps/lnt.nightly-test
>>
>> I believe there are:
>>
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/220/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/tests.XFAIL
>>
>> They are just automatically XFAILED after they occur a second
>> time. ;-)
>
> OIC... then that's not good...
>
> So it seems that prior the build 108 the testing process always timed
> out (it looks like it had a timeout of 20 minutes which was not long
> enough). At build 108, it lists those applications as failing.

Yes.

> I am pretty sure that there were no x86 test-suite failures when I
> committed the vectorizer. We'll need to investigate...

It may be due to the different platform (darwin). The list is sort so 
maybe you can try some of them on linux.

Tobi