[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet?

[Arnaud de Grandmaison]

**
<http://www.llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=156809>This
was fixed @ r156809 (May 15th), so after the 3.1 release branched : it
did not went into the 3.1 release, but is available svn head. You may
want to give it a try.

Cheers,
** <http://www.llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=156809>

-- 
Arnaud de Grandmaison

On 06/22/2012 12:27 PM, Albert Graef wrote:

> On 06/22/2012 07:42 AM, David Röthlisberger wrote:
>> On 22 Jun 2012, at 00:08, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>>>> Albert Graef <Dr.Graef at t-online.de> writes:
>>>> - libclang ends up as liblibclang.so (building clang along with LLVM).
>>>>>> Surely that's not intended?
>>>> There was some discussion about this on the past, but I can't recall all
>>>> the details. In any case, it is something easy enough to change.
>> This should be fixed as of 3.1. See
>> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12620 for the fix, and links
>> to previous discussions.
> I tried this with the official 3.1 tarballs of LLVM and clang from the
> Download page, and liblibclang.so is what I got using the cmake build on
> Linux. So no, to me it doesn't seem to be fixed in 3.1. The linked
> thread on clang-dev seems inconclusive to me as well.
>
> Albert
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120622/efcdfde9/attachment.html>