[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet?

[Albert Graef]

On 06/22/2012 07:42 AM, David Röthlisberger wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2012, at 00:08, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>> > Albert Graef <Dr.Graef at t-online.de> writes:
>> > - libclang ends up as liblibclang.so (building clang along with LLVM).
>>> >> Surely that's not intended?
>> > 
>> > There was some discussion about this on the past, but I can't recall all
>> > the details. In any case, it is something easy enough to change.
> 
> This should be fixed as of 3.1. See
> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12620 for the fix, and links
> to previous discussions.

I tried this with the official 3.1 tarballs of LLVM and clang from the
Download page, and liblibclang.so is what I got using the cmake build on
Linux. So no, to me it doesn't seem to be fixed in 3.1. The linked
thread on clang-dev seems inconclusive to me as well.

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag