[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet?
Joshua Cranmer
pidgeot18 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 21 07:32:37 PDT 2012
On 6/20/2012 8:13 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to
> stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a
> recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using
> some features from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't
> implement?
>
Note that the LLVM documentation (e.g.,
<http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html>) treats the
configure-and-make build system as canonical, and I recall when I first
used the cmake build system, I was told that one thing I was trying to
do was unsupported in the cmake build (I've forgotten what it was though).
--
Joshua Cranmer
News submodule owner
DXR coauthor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120621/4adc4acf/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list