[LLVMdev] Fwd: RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, NEW)
Mikael Lyngvig
mikael at lyngvig.org
Sun Jun 17 03:17:06 PDT 2012
No problem. Perhaps some of it can be converted into mere patches to
existing documentation?
That leaves us with three docs so far:
1. Testing.
2. Windows build.
3. Windows buildbot slave.
2012/6/16 Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote:
>
>> Hi Takumi,
>>
>> THANK YOU for your excellent review! It makes all the work worthwhile in
>> itself.
>>
>> It is getting "late" here (it is early morning) so I am about to call it
>> a day. But I will contemplate and incorporate your suggestions tomorrow,
>> and send you a full reply. I think I originally wrote a document where I
>> addressed both Visual Studio and MinGW, but then decided that there were
>> way too many "if this" and "if that"s to continue on that path.
>>
>> Thanks again :-)
>>
>
> Under Python installation, you mention that Python is only needed for the
> test suite. This is not true, as the normal LLVM build still requires
> Python.
>
> I would seriously consider splitting this up into "building LLVM/Clang"
> and then "getting and running the test suite." At first glance, a Windows
> user may get overwhelmed by the number of steps that are listed in this
> document. But only a handful of them are actually needed if you just want
> to build LLVM/Clang and do not care about the test suite. Or at the very
> least include a Windows quick-start guide at the beginning which just lists
> Python, CMake, and MinGW. And then introduce Subversion if they want the
> latest sources, then everything else if they want to run the test suite.
>
>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mikael
>>
>>
>> 2012/6/16 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>
>>
>>> Mikael,
>>>
>>> Thanks for working on.
>>>
>>> My gross comments...
>>>
>>> - Canonical URL of LLVM project is; http://llvm.org/ , not www.llvm.org.
>>>
>>> - "test-suite and cygwin" could be split out. It would be special thing.
>>>
>>> - Memory/storage requirements would be moved to "A.B Debugging". Less
>>> memory would be enough without debug build.
>>>
>>> - Python (x64 binary) is available, too. I am using.
>>> Python 2.7.1 (r271:86832, Nov 27 2010, 17:19:03) [MSC v.1500 64 bit
>>> (AMD64)] on win32
>>>
>>> - Distinguish "test-suite" and "{llvm|clang} tests". (Installing
>>> GnuWin32)
>>>
>>> - Don't recommend to delete MSYS sh.exe in "Installing CMake". Use
>>> MSYS Makefiles instead with msys.
>>>
>>> - gnuwin32 is not needed on %PATH% if gnuwin32 is dedicated to tests.
>>> Use LLVM_LIT_TOOLS_DIR instead then.
>>> (gnuwin32 is not needed when person is working on MSYS bash shell, FYI)
>>>
>>> - cmake and python are needed on %PATH%, as long as they are not
>>> invoked explicitly.
>>> cmake-generated Makefiles know where they are.
>>> eg. "make edit_cache", "make check"
>>>
>>> - If the target of this would be for newbies, you may mention
>>> "cmake-gui", too.
>>> FYI, I am usually use cmake-gui.exe, because I am n00b.
>>>
>>> - (Building the Sources), In my experience, make.exe -jN tends to be
>>> choked. I don't know where is -jN-stable gnu make on mingw. (Lemme
>>> know if you knew better version of make!)
>>>
>>> - Why don't you mention "make {check|clang-test|check-all}", despite
>>> of introducing gnuwin32?
>>>
>>> - You forgot to mention a few important cmake variables.
>>>
>>> - CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release (for most purpose)
>>> - CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX (Who would be happy if clang were installed
>>> onto C:\PROGRA~1\?)
>>> - LLVM_LIT_TOOLS_DIR, to use gnuwin32 dedicated to testing llvm and
>>> clang.
>>> - LLVM_EXTERNAL_CLANG_SOURCE_DIR, to check out clang outside from
>>> llvm source tree
>>> - PYTHON_EXECUTABLE, if %PATH% does not contain python.
>>>
>>> - Consider to introduce ninja?
>>>
>>> Anyway, this could be integrated to "GettingStartedVS.html" ;)
>>>
>>> ...Takumi
>>>
>>> ps. feel free to visit and ask me on the irc, oftc#llvm.
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Justin Holewinski
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120617/95508adc/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list