[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite
Joshua Cranmer
pidgeot18 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 15 20:04:26 PDT 2012
On 6/15/2012 8:12 PM, Mikael Lyngvig wrote:
>
> Not having an AV or swithching it off at times is not a sign of
> stupidity. The best antivirus is a mindful, knowledgeable user.
> And the
> antivirus doesn't really protect you in case of risky behavior.
>
>
> I couldn't have said it better myself. I've had three viruses in 29
> years and only one of them was my own fault. I've spent hours trying
> to explain people that trusting an antivirus solution is unfortunate
> at best.
>
> Yes, if the antivirus accepts an exception for a yet nonexistent
> file. I
> bet most of them won't do that without fiddling with configuration
> files.
>
>
> Ok. You get it your way :-) Disable antivirus, checkout, and then
> add the offending file to the exclusion list.
A better rule of thumb I would say is to exclude the entire source and
build directories from antivirus. On-access file scan hurts build times
a fair amount, and I really doubt that any of your source code is going
to have viruses in them :-P
--
Joshua Cranmer
News submodule owner
DXR coauthor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120615/028634ba/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list