[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question

[Chandler Carruth]

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote:
>
>> And one more question regarding ASan cmake build.
>> Currently unittests are fine, but regular "clang -faddress-sanitizer" is
>> not:
>>
>
> As a side note: I don't like that the current cmake machinery builds asan
> tests by explicitly passing libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a.
> IMO it needs to use "clang -faddress-sanitizer".
>

Why?

These are internal tests, and I think it is reasonable to use internal
implementation details to make them work.

I'm not saying we can't get there, I think we can, but I think it may be
somewhat more annoying than you might imagine to get there in the short
term.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120711/57861a51/attachment.html>