[LLVMdev] STLport

[Villmow, Micah]

Sure, here is our diff against 3.0.

The reason we are using it is because of problems with statically linking libstdc++ on certain Linux distributions.

From: Welson Sun [mailto:welson.sun at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 7:49 PM
To: Villmow, Micah
Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] STLport

Good to hear that. Doesn't seem to be a popular combination since googling results little information on this. Is it possible for you to show the changes to LLVM?

Personally I don't like STLport, not sure the real benefit versus using compiler's STL.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com<mailto:Micah.Villmow at amd.com>> wrote:
We are able to compile it internally, but it required some changes to LLVM to get it to work.

From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu> [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu>] On Behalf Of Welson Sun
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 11:48 AM
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: [LLVMdev] STLport

I am curious to see if anyone has ever been successfully compiled LLVM with STLport?

I tried compiling LLVM 3.0 with STLport-5.2.1, and failed.


Thanks,
Welson



--
Welson

Phone: (408) 418-8385
Email:  welson.sun at gmail.com<mailto:welson.sun at gmail.com>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120418/45e59de7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: STLPort.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3388 bytes
Desc: STLPort.diff
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120418/45e59de7/attachment.obj>