[LLVMdev] STLport

[Welson Sun]

Good to hear that. Doesn't seem to be a popular combination since googling
results little information on this. Is it possible for you to show the
changes to LLVM?

Personally I don't like STLport, not sure the real benefit versus using
compiler's STL.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com>wrote:

>  We are able to compile it internally, but it required some changes to
> LLVM to get it to work.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Welson Sun
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 17, 2012 11:48 AM
> *To:* LLVM Developers Mailing List
> *Subject:* [LLVMdev] STLport****
>
> ** **
>
> I am curious to see if anyone has ever been successfully compiled LLVM
> with STLport? ****
>
> ** **
>
> I tried compiling LLVM 3.0 with STLport-5.2.1, and failed.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Welson****
>



-- 
Welson

Phone: (408) 418-8385
Email:  welson.sun at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120417/ffa09d09/attachment.html>