[LLVMdev] is anyone using the sparc backend?

[Martin Whitaker]

Dan Gohman wrote:
> I'm removing old targets that no longer appear actively maintained,
> to reduce the burden for target-independent codegen maintenance.
>
> Does anyone object to the removal of the Sparc backend?
>
I have an interest in the SPARC backend (and contributed a patch to improve it 
a few months ago, although I don't think the patch ever got applied). Other 
projects have got in the way, but I still intend to come back to this.

Martin