[LLVMdev] Question regarding basic-block placement optimization

[Andrew Trick]

That's fine. I've been following along and what you're doing sounds right. I'll try to provide feedback on your latest commit once I have time to fully understand how it works.

Andy 

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 23, 2011, at 1:14 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> Ok, I think I have a working pass that is based much more on what we've talked about here. The patch is attached. I'd love to commit it soon-ish and then start tweaking it based on feedback from you, others, and looking at how it actually works in the wild.
> 
> After chatting briefly w/ Owen in IRC, he encouraged me to just commit this as it's behind an off-by-default flag, and not touching anything else. I'm going to go ahead with that so I can more easily start working on statistics and clean up associated other stuff. It'll also help me debug some weird probabilities.
> 
> Feel free to carry on with discussion here or on the commit thread. =] Thanks again for all the really great feedback and thoughts!!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111023/cb16ae4b/attachment.html>