[LLVMdev] Announcing: LLVM 2.9 RC2 Testing Phase

[Bill Wendling]

On Mar 25, 2011, at 4:40 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:

> On 2011-03-25 08:07, Bill Wendling wrote:
>> Well! we had a rather fruitful phase 1 testing round. Several issues were addressed. After a bit of a delay, we are ready for phase 2 testing.
>> 
>> This phase is to make sure that no patches submitted to fix problems and complete features in phase 1 caused further difficulties. Please download the sources, compile them, and then compile as much as you can with both clang and llvm-gcc.
>> 
>> Sources:
>> 
>> 	clang-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
>> 	llvm-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
>> 	llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
>> 	llvm-test-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
>> 
>> Available here:
>> 
>> 	http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/
> 
> This change:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_29/test/SemaCXX/goto.cpp?r1=127752&r2=128255&diff_format=h
> 
> causes:
> 
> FAIL: Clang :: SemaCXX/goto.cpp (2268 of 2917)
> ******************** TEST 'Clang :: SemaCXX/goto.cpp' FAILED ********************
> Script:
> --
> /home/dim/obj/llvm-1/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wall -fblocks /home/dim/src/llvm-2.9rc2/tools/clang/test/SemaCXX/goto.cpp
> --
> Exit Code: 1
> Command Output (stderr):
> --
> error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
>  Line 73: redefinition of 'f'
> error: 'note' diagnostics seen but not expected:
>  Line 5: previous definition is here
> 2 errors generated.
> --
> 
> ********************
> 
> This is because the second definition of f() is not enclosed in a
> separate namespace.  It looks like it is also in trunk, btw...

The patch that added this part of the test needed a previous patch. I applied it. It looks like there will be an RC3.

-bw