[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions?
Renato Golin
rengolin at systemcall.org
Tue Jun 14 01:37:48 PDT 2011
On 14 June 2011 02:03, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> You laugh, but we support it (or at least we did at one point with gcc-4.2).
In IR? In the form of synchronous exceptions?
How can you possible represent a "signal cfg" in IR? Is there a need
for unwinding information at all?
cheers,
--renato
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list