[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions?
Bill Wendling
wendling at apple.com
Mon Jun 13 18:03:33 PDT 2011
On Jun 13, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 13 June 2011 22:27, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote:
>> But yes, I am not inclined to support asynchronous exceptions from signals.
>
> Ah, ok. I was beginning to wonder... ;)
>
You laugh, but we support it (or at least we did at one point with gcc-4.2).
-bw
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list