[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions?

Bill Wendling wendling at apple.com
Mon Jun 13 18:03:33 PDT 2011


On Jun 13, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Renato Golin wrote:

> On 13 June 2011 22:27, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote:
>> But yes, I am not inclined to support asynchronous exceptions from signals.
> 
> Ah, ok. I was beginning to wonder... ;)
> 
You laugh, but we support it (or at least we did at one point with gcc-4.2).

-bw





More information about the llvm-dev mailing list