[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 85, Issue 50

[Bill Wendling]

Hi Peter,

It's inconsistencies like this that prompted the rewrite. :-)

-bw

On Jul 28, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Peter Lawrence <peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> John,
>            I have been using the first official release llvm-2.9 tarball and a clang from very shortly after that,
> built for my PowerPC-Apple-Darwin,
> 
> I am a bit surprised that this would have changed since then, but pleasantly surprised nevertheless.
> 
> 
> Peter Lawrence.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:49 PM, John McCall wrote:
> 
>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:22 PM, Peter Lawrence wrote:
>>> John,
>>>           I'm still not sure what you're talking about, I have included the assembly
>>> output from two compilations, one with a user explicit catch-all, one with only an
>>> implicit cleanup, the DWARF Action Table and Types Table are absolutely identical,
>>> as are the indexes used to reference the Action Table from the region maps.
>> 
>> What compiler are you talking about, and on what platform?
>> 
>> The results I'm seeing clearly have both gcc and clang on Darwin generating
>> different LSDAs for your cleanup examples and your catch-all examples.
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110730/d86d793a/attachment.html>