[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 85, Issue 50

[Peter Lawrence]

John,
            I have been using the first official release llvm-2.9  
tarball and a clang from very shortly after that,
built for my PowerPC-Apple-Darwin,

I am a bit surprised that this would have changed since then, but  
pleasantly surprised nevertheless.


Peter Lawrence.




On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:49 PM, John McCall wrote:

> On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:22 PM, Peter Lawrence wrote:
>> John,
>>           I'm still not sure what you're talking about, I have  
>> included the assembly
>> output from two compilations, one with a user explicit catch-all,  
>> one with only an
>> implicit cleanup, the DWARF Action Table and Types Table are  
>> absolutely identical,
>> as are the indexes used to reference the Action Table from the  
>> region maps.
>
> What compiler are you talking about, and on what platform?
>
> The results I'm seeing clearly have both gcc and clang on Darwin  
> generating
> different LSDAs for your cleanup examples and your catch-all examples.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110728/86139808/attachment.html>