[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
FlyLanguage
flylanguage at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 12:12:02 PDT 2011
Den 26.07.2011 20:12, skrev Talin:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:56 AM, FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com
> <mailto:flylanguage at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> #define ASSERT_STRM(cond, args) \
> if (!(cond)) AssertionFailureStream(__FILE____, __LINE__)
> << args
>
> Note that there's no trailing semicolon, as this is supplied at the
> point where the macro is invoked.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> Neat, but inducing a debug trap is even more useful on asserts
> (optionally).
>
>
> What's the best way to do that? I'd like to incorporate it into my
> frontend's diagnostics.
Depends on platform. asm {int 3} on x86, asm {trap} on ppc, DebugBreak
on windows, etc.
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list