[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
Talin
viridia at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 11:12:23 PDT 2011
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:56 AM, FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com> wrote:
> #define ASSERT_STRM(cond, args) \
>> if (!(cond)) AssertionFailureStream(__FILE_**_, __LINE__) << args
>>
>> Note that there's no trailing semicolon, as this is supplied at the
>> point where the macro is invoked.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> Neat, but inducing a debug trap is even more useful on asserts
> (optionally).
>
What's the best way to do that? I'd like to incorporate it into my
frontend's diagnostics.
--
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110726/8309df13/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list