[LLVMdev] type-system-rewrite branch landing tomorrow

[Chris Lattner]

On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Garrison Venn wrote:

> Attached is a patch for the non ExceptionDemo demos which gets rid of the old
> const qualifier usage for Type. Although I recently commited the ExceptionDemo
> changes, I did not want to touch code that I did not "own" without other's approval.
> Even though trivial, I did not test this patch.

Assuming that this fixes the build and haven't been applied already, please commit!  I'll fix IRBuilder.

-Chris

> 
> Garrison
> 
> <Some_examples_const_Type.patch>
> 
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 12:00, Garrison Venn wrote:
> 
>> Sorry, these IRBuilder methods are really in IRBuilderBase.
>> 
>> Garrison
>> 
>> On Jul 11, 2011, at 11:54, Garrison Venn wrote:
>> 
>>> Are the get type methods for IRBuilder, such as const IntegerType *getInt32Ty(), going to have 
>>> their return type const qualifiers removed? Doing so would match the semi equivalent static
>>> methods of Type, such as static IntegerType *getInt32Ty(LLVMContext &C).
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> 
>>> Garrison
>>> 
>>> On Jul 9, 2011, at 3:35, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>> 
>>>> FYI, the type-system-rewrite branch is landing tomorrow morning, in mainline llvm, llvm-gcc and clang.  I don't have updates, so dragonegg will have to remain broken until someone can fix it (the changes aren't too terrible, llvm-gcc is a good template).
>>>> 
>>>> If you're interested in an early preview, the type-system-rewrite branch contains the code for llvm and clang.  I sent the llvm-gcc patch out earlier today.  The test passes all the llvm and clang regression tests, as well as llvm-test with both the new clang and an old clang (stress testing the bc autoupgrade logic).
>>>> 
>>>> -Chris
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>> 
>> 
>