[LLVMdev] Comments on the bundle proposal

Pekka Jääskeläinen pekka.jaaskelainen at tut.fi
Tue Dec 6 23:24:07 PST 2011


On 12/07/2011 01:10 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote:
> Another approach would be to have a pseudo-instruction (say, "macro"),
> which would be associated with a sequence of instructions, which have
> been outlined, and which have been replaced by the "macro" instruction.
> The "macro" instruction would have the information about registers used
> and defined, and it would have a link to the actual instructions that
> define it.

BTW did anyone seriously consider the Carlos' proposal? The inheritance idea
has its merits as it can hide several behaviors/semantics behind the "mother" 
MachineInstrBundle class, as far as I've understood.



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list