[LLVMdev] git Status

[David A. Greene]

FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com> writes:

> 1) A misunderstanding that global revision numbers are necessary and 
> that 'git describe' along with frequent tagging (commit hooks) isn't 
> good enough.

I'm not sure what's needed here.  I don't care about global revision
numbers at all so I can't really comment on what should be used to
replace them with git.  Hopefully someone else who cares can chime in.

> 2) Nobody writing up how git should be used with the current llvm 
> workflow (which is not going to adapt to an SCM, but the other way 
> around, which is understandable.)

I'm willing to take a crack at this as I have to do something like this
already anyway.  I won't be able to get to it until next week, though.

                                -Dave