[LLVMdev] build errors while cross compiling llvm-gcc for ARM
Sanjeev chugh
sanjuchugh at gmail.com
Mon Jun 28 01:32:26 PDT 2010
Thanks, last doubt :)
But I wanted to say is using these binutils I have built a llvm compiler for
our ARM target.
Now our libraries which are either compiled with native ARM or with this
llvm compiler gives same performance numbers. However this only llvm
compiler if compared with x86 compiler gives huge performance gain.
Any idea why this might be happening ?
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info
> wrote:
> > Sorry about that. As you can see, I'm using binutils (ld & as ) from arm
> > toolchain we use to build things for our target.
> >
> > arm_a_b_c_ld -v gives 2.17.50.20070611
> >
> > arm_a_b_c_as -v gives 2.17.50.20070611
> This is definitely not the latest binutils you've stated before. As
> you might see - these are at least 3 years old and are known to be
> heavily buggy on ARM.
>
> > Do you belive that older binaries of (linker & assembler) can cause
> performance drop ?
> No. They are just buggy (at least assembler).
>
> > Unfortunately I'm not in a position to update the arm compiler for my
> company :)
> Well, sorry, then you're not lucky then. You should expect invalid
> code / spurious error messages produced in many places (and you
> already saw this!)
>
> --
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100628/7f77bd0d/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list