[LLVMdev] Void values
Duncan Sands
baldrick at free.fr
Sat Jun 12 04:23:21 PDT 2010
> I don't know of anyone working on it, but I'd really like to eliminate void. It doesn't seem like a useful feature of the type system. Functions can be changed to return {} for example.
Not having a void type also means that people writing front-ends for C-like
languages won't try to convert "void*" into a pointer to the LLVM void type
and be confused when it doesn't work :)
Ciao,
Duncan.
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list