[LLVMdev] Code Size Benchmark

Zhongxing Xu xuzhongxing at gmail.com
Mon Apr 19 23:18:23 PDT 2010


On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Zhongxing Xu <xuzhongxing at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We did some benchmarks on code size with clang, gcc 4.5, and open64.
> Clang
> > performed second in the test. The benchmark is CSiBE. Clang can't compile
> > the linux kernel (some inline asm not supported) and replaypc (error: use
> of
> > unknown builtin '__builtin_next_arg'). The concrete results are attached.
>
> That error looks extremely strange; where is the call to
> __builtin_next_arg coming from?
>

The replaypc package of CSiBE (http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/*csibe*/) only
contains .i files. They were probably generated by gcc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100420/d153626b/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list