[LLVMdev] OT: intel darwin losing primary target status

Jack Howarth howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu
Fri Sep 18 12:33:15 PDT 2009

   So is this basically a depreciation of libgcc for darwin10 and
later? I was wondering about that very issue awhile ago (as in
what exactly what relationship clang would have to libgcc). If
so, perhaps the correct answer is to see if FSF gcc would accept
changing the default build for darwin10 and later to not use
the FSF libgcc and instead move any additional symbols into a

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list