[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
Evan Cheng
evan.cheng at apple.com
Mon Sep 14 12:18:15 PDT 2009
I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the numbers. For example, I know
llvm-gcc does significantly worse on LAME. On the other hand, the
dhrystone, md5, and blowfish numbers are out of line with my
expectation.
It would be nice if someone can perform the tests independently and
file bugzilla reports.
Thanks,
Evan
On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Edward O'Callaghan wrote:
> screw that site, its useless info run by a linux gnu zealot.
>
> 2009/9/14 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>:
>> On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?
>>> page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1
>>
>> Unfortunately, they don't specify what flags are used, what
>> architecture is compiled for etc. It's entirely possible that they
>> are accidentally compiling the llvm-gcc binaries for x86-32 and the
>> gcc ones for x86-64 for example.
>>
>> If anyone has time to try to reproduce this, it would definitely be
>> useful!
>>
>> -Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Edward O'Callaghan
> http://www.auroraux.org/
> eocallaghan at auroraux dot org
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list