[LLVMdev] 2.6 request - Bug 4879

Chris Lattner clattner at apple.com
Tue Sep 8 14:53:13 PDT 2009

On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote:
> This can not go into 2.6, because r79742 is not in 2.6:
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090817/085284.html
> Should this really be a release candidate? Its changing quite a bit  
> and its not causing a regression.

No, the bigger patch should not go into 2.6.  Devang, can you please  
prepare a version of this patch that applies cleanly to the 2.6 branch?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090908/3e6f5001/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list