<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>This can not go into 2.6, because r79742 is not in 2.6:</div><div><a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090817/085284.html">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090817/085284.html</a></div><div><br></div><div>Should this really be a release candidate? Its changing quite a bit and its not causing a regression.</div></div></div></blockquote></div><br><div>No, the bigger patch should not go into 2.6. Devang, can you please prepare a version of this patch that applies cleanly to the 2.6 branch?</div><div><br></div><div><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div><a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090831/086443.html">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090831/086443.html</a> </div></div></div><br></div><div>-Chris</div></body></html>