[LLVMdev] 2.6 request - Bug 4879

[Chris Lattner]

On Sep 7, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Michael Lyle wrote:
First-- thanks to Daniel Dunbar for reporting this issue from my
> earlier coarse report on IRC and to Devang Patel for fixing it.
>
> I'm writing to request that this fix (r81058) find its way into the
> 2.6 release.  Code compiled with clang that uses VLAs is horribly
> broken without r81058 (at least on x86-64).  I don't know if it has
> any other implications but it's definitely greatly stabilizing for our
> code base.

Makes sense.

Tanya, please pull http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090831/086443.html 
  into 2.6 when convenient, thanks!


-Chris

>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
> PS -- I am not subscribed to this list.
>
> -- 
> Michael P. Lyle
> Chief Executive Officer
> Translattice, Inc.
> mlyle at translattice.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev