[LLVMdev] ScheduleDAG Question
Gaster, Benedict
Benedict.Gaster at amd.com
Fri Sep 4 13:53:04 PDT 2009
Hi David,
Interesting... I have come across a problem that looks like edge is
being removed and I'm wondering if it may be related. The problem is
described in http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=4891.
Regards,
Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
On Behalf Of David Greene
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 7:25 PM
To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] ScheduleDAG Question
On Thursday 03 September 2009 21:13, David Greene wrote:
> Hmm...except there's a little dashed blue line from the call to the
chain
> (I think) field of the load. Is that the dependence I want? I don't
know
> how to read these graphs.
Interesting. So with -view-legalize-dags, that little dashed blue line
has
moved from the load to the store that feeds the load. That's wrong.
But it's still there with -view-legalize-types-dags, so legalize types
must
be buggy. But -disable-legalize-types doesn't fix the problem. So the
general legalize code seems to have the same issue.
LLVM 2.5 compiles this fine, so it's something we've altered in the
codebase.
I did a diff of all of our changes to lib/CodeGen and
include/llvm/CodeGen
but nothing jumpoed out as obviously wrong. I suppose it's possible we
present slightly different code to the legalize passes than the
unmodified
LLVM.
Fun times, indeed.
-Dave
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list