[LLVMdev] Criticism of garbage collection support in LLVM

Nick Lewycky nicholas at mxc.ca
Sun Jan 18 20:36:57 PST 2009


Keir Mierle wrote:
> And the followup:
> 
> http://lhc-compiler.blogspot.com/2009/01/why-llvm-probably-wont-replace-c.html

And if you're pointing to that, you should probably also read the next 
followup:

http://lhc-compiler.blogspot.com/2009/01/llvm-is-great.html

Nick

> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov <foldr at codedgers.com> wrote:
>> This may be of interest:
>>
>> http://lhc-compiler.blogspot.com/2009/01/case-against-cllvm.html
>>
>> People implementing a new Haskell compiler explain why LLVM is an
>> unsuitable target for them.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> 




More information about the llvm-dev mailing list