[LLVMdev] RFA: TREE_READONLY in LLVM-GCC

[Bill Wendling]

On Jan 5, 2009, at 4:41 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:

> On Monday 05 January 2009 12:42:16 Bill Wendling wrote:
>> I did mark it as TREE_CONSTANT. Is that enough?
>
> No idea - if it works I guess it was enough :)  I was
> actually thinking of TREE_STATIC:
>
I went ahead and just kept it as "TREE_CONSTANT". :-)

-bw