[LLVMdev] Unit test patch, updated

[Chris Lattner]

On Jan 5, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Misha Brukman wrote:

> 2009/1/1 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
> On Jan 1, 2009, at 1:21 AM, Talin wrote:
> > I'm thinking that getting unit tests for the classes in ADT should
> > be an early goal.
>
> Can I suggest the AP[S]Int class?  If you look in llvm/test/Integer
> you'll see a whole bunch of tests that really want to be unit tests
> but that aren't.  :(
>
> Chris, do you mean *all* the .ll files in that dir should become  
> unittests, or are you talking about some specific files that should  
> be unittests, and others that should stay as llvm-as/llvm-dis tests?
>
> I'm assuming a##.* are prime candidates, what about the others?  Are  
> the double llvm-as/llvm-dis tests about bitcode printing/parsing or  
> are they really testing some auto-simplification built-in to the  
> APSInt class?

Oh, sorry, I just meant the "a*" tests, which are basically doing  
constant folding (but not checking the results!)

-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090105/4a9ec14a/attachment.html>