[LLVMdev] detailed comparison of generated code size for LLVM and other compilers

John Regehr regehr at cs.utah.edu
Mon Dec 14 07:33:42 PST 2009

Previous message: [LLVMdev] Any reason why fastcc on x86 shouldn't use ECX as a return register?
Next message: [LLVMdev] detailed comparison of generated code size for LLVM and other compilers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

See here:

   http://embed.cs.utah.edu/embarrassing/

There is a lot of data there.  Please excuse bugs and other problems. 
Feedback would be appreciated.

John Regehr

Previous message: [LLVMdev] Any reason why fastcc on x86 shouldn't use ECX as a return register?
Next message: [LLVMdev] detailed comparison of generated code size for LLVM and other compilers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list