[LLVMdev] Unwinds Gone Wild
Jonathan S. Shapiro
shap at eros-os.com
Mon Sep 29 18:22:06 PDT 2008
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 17:37 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> Ok, but, realize that in order to be platform abi compatible with gcc/g
> ++, one _must_ do certain things. If you had a totally different
> scheme that didn't interoperate with gcc/g++, then, you break the
> platform abi. If one can throw out such compatibility, then, well, it
> just doesn't matter.
Yep.
Since I'm going to need to deal with this charming ball of barbed wire
in the BitC documentation, are there any good pointers toward things I
need to get my head around concerning libunwind?
shap
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list