[LLVMdev] CVS Branches To Discard?

[Vikram S. Adve]

Reed,

Can the "see" branch be renamed "SVA", for Secure Virtual  
Architecture?  This is the new name of the LLVA system and project.   
It uses LLVM as the instruction set and compiler infrastructure.

Thanks,

--Vikram
http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/


On Apr 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Reid Spencer wrote:

> All,
>
> We are considering removing some branches and tags in the conversion
> process from CVS to SVN. We don't want to do this in a vaccuum, so
> please read carefully.
>
> A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion
> repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches  
> and
> tags. We can minimize the impact of this by only keeping branches and
> tags that we really need. This gives us an opportunity to clean up  
> some
> "dead wood" too. Obviously, I don't want to do this without your
> feedback (loosing your needed branch/tag would be bad).
>
> So, please consult the SVN Migration page,
> http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html. This lists the branches and tags we
> have currently and whether they are scheduled for deletion or  
> inclusion.
> If you think I've categorized something incorrectly, please let me  
> know
> ASAP!
>
> We'd like to get this finalized over the next few days.
>
> Thanks in advance for your help,
>
> Reid.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev