[LLVMdev] moving to svn?

[Alkis Evlogimenos ('Αλκης Ευλογημένος)]

Perhaps code.google.com svn? The only thing that can be a problem is
the lack of support for commit scripts.

On 11/29/06, Ralph Corderoy <ralph at inputplus.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> > 2. The main deficiencies of CVS don't impact us much (we aren't
> > hampered by lack of atomic commits, renames, and better branch
> > facilities).
>
> If people would like to see the logical `patch set' that made up a CVS
> commit then cvsps may be useful, or, as others have said, use Tailor to
> convert to a local repos. in your preferred format.
>
>     http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
>     http://www.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/Tailor
>
> > 4. I maintain that a real distributed VCS would be very useful for
> > LLVM, perhaps moreso than the other features provided by new VCS's.
> > Last time this came up, the available distributed vcs's all had
> > serious issues.  Perhaps mercurial is 'there now'.  I don't know.
>
> Bazaar, from Canonical -- the same people as behind Ubuntu, has been
> concentrating on performance recently.  It may be worth keeping an eye
> on for the future.  I expect it will gain quite a large market share
> over time.
>
>     http://bazaar-vcs.org/
>     http://bazaar-vcs.org/RcsComparisons
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Ralph.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>


-- 

Alkis