[LLVMdev] Re: Version Control

[Reid Spencer]

Please disregard this last message I sent out. It got sent half-baked.
I'll finish it up and send it again.
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:58, Reid Spencer wrote:
> LLVMers,
> 
> The oversight group has been kicking around the idea of getting a better
> version control system than CVS. The problem is, we're not quite sure
> what "better" means. So, we thought we'd ask your opinions.
> 
> There are three options, unless someone strongly advocates another
> solution:
> 
> 1. Stay with CVS
> 2. Use Subversion
> 3. Use arch
> 
> Some of the things we're trying to accomplish are:
> 
>       * Atomic commit (all changed files in a change set get committed
>         or none of them do). [Subversion] 
>       * Apache httpd based authentication/authorization [Subversion with
>         mod_webdav] 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20050107/76b5ca27/attachment.sig>