[llvm] [SCEV][NFC] Refactor LoopGuards range check matching (PR #210362)
Ramkumar Ramachandra via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 17 12:47:57 PDT 2026
================
@@ -16024,11 +16024,29 @@ void ScalarEvolution::LoopGuards::collectFromBlock(
// SCEV. In particular, using contextual facts to imply flags is *NOT*
// legal. See the scoping rules for flags in the header to understand why.
+ // Puts rewrite rule \p From -> \p To into the rewrite map. Also if \p From
+ // and \p FromRewritten are the same (i.e. there has been no rewrite
+ // registered for \p From), then puts this value in the list of rewritten
+ // expressions.
+ auto AddRewrite = [&](const SCEV *From, const SCEV *FromRewritten,
+ const SCEV *To) {
+ if (From == FromRewritten)
+ ExprsToRewrite.push_back(From);
+ RewriteMap[From] = To;
+ };
+
+ // Checks whether \p S has already been rewritten. In that case returns the
+ // existing rewrite because we want to chain further rewrites onto the
+ // already rewritten value. Otherwise returns \p S.
+ auto GetMaybeRewritten = [&](const SCEV *S) {
+ return RewriteMap.lookup_or(S, S);
+ };
+
// Check for a condition of the form (-C1 + X < C2). InstCombine will
// create this form when combining two checks of the form (X u< C2 + C1) and
// (X >=u C1).
- auto MatchRangeCheckIdiom = [&SE, Predicate, LHS, RHS, &RewriteMap,
- &ExprsToRewrite]() {
+ auto MatchRangeCheckIdiom = [&](ICmpInst::Predicate Predicate,
+ const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS) {
----------------
artagnon wrote:
```suggestion
auto MatchRangeCheckIdiom = [&SE, &RewriteMap, &ExprsToRewrite, &AddRewrite](ICmpInst::Predicate Predicate,
const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS) {
```
A bit unfortunate, but probably best not to overshadow the lambda capture with arguments? Either that, or revert to no-arguments (which isn't pretty either?)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/210362
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list