[llvm] [LoopVersioningLICM] Do not let llvm.pseudoprobe block loop versioning (PR #209684)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 16 23:46:11 PDT 2026


github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopVersioningLICM.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopVersioningLICM.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopVersioningLICM.cpp
index f910b19cd..7ed7714e2 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopVersioningLICM.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopVersioningLICM.cpp
@@ -305,8 +305,8 @@ bool LoopVersioningLICM::instructionSafeForVersioning(Instruction *I) {
   if (auto *Call = dyn_cast<CallBase>(I)) {
     // Debug info and pseudo-probe intrinsics are placeholders with no
     // observable effect on the loop's memory accesses. Ignore them so that
-    // their presence (in the presence of -fpseudo-probe-for-profiling) does not block
-    // loop versioning.
+    // their presence (in the presence of -fpseudo-probe-for-profiling) does not
+    // block loop versioning.
     if (Call->isDebugOrPseudoInst())
       return true;
 

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/209684


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list