[llvm] 1959535 - [X86] combineAdd - remove unnecessary add(a,concat(vpmaddwd(x,y),vpmaddwd(z,w))) -> vpdpwssd(a,concat(x,z),concat(y,w)) fold (#209838)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 16 07:05:56 PDT 2026


Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2026-07-16T14:05:51Z
New Revision: 19595357e32b36383a025fddaaf8c38f90658b7b

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/19595357e32b36383a025fddaaf8c38f90658b7b
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/19595357e32b36383a025fddaaf8c38f90658b7b.diff

LOG: [X86] combineAdd - remove unnecessary add(a,concat(vpmaddwd(x,y),vpmaddwd(z,w))) -> vpdpwssd(a,concat(x,z),concat(y,w)) fold (#209838)

We already handle vpmaddwd concatenation in combineConcatVectorOps - but
512-bit vpmaddwd is only available on BWI targets, which was missing
from the tests

Technically if there's a target that has AVX512VNNI but not BWI, then
this fold would be useful, but there's no such target and there's a
limit to "what if" optimisations we really need.

A small attempt at cleaning out some not very useful code from
X86ISelLowering.cpp - I'm intending to do a lot more of this for 24.x / #143088

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
    llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/vpdpwssd.ll

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index bb4b13e4feca4..97e783c09f0f2 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -59798,22 +59798,6 @@ static SDValue combineAdd(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
     }
   }
 
-  // Peephole for 512-bit VPDPBSSD on non-VLX targets.
-  // TODO: Should this be part of matchPMADDWD/matchPMADDWD_2?
-  if (Subtarget.hasVNNI() && Subtarget.useAVX512Regs() && VT == MVT::v16i32) {
-    SDValue Accum, Lo0, Lo1, Hi0, Hi1;
-    if (sd_match(N, m_Add(m_Value(Accum),
-                          m_Node(ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS,
-                                 m_BinOp(X86ISD::VPMADDWD, m_Value(Lo0),
-                                         m_Value(Lo1)),
-                                 m_BinOp(X86ISD::VPMADDWD, m_Value(Hi0),
-                                         m_Value(Hi1)))))) {
-      return DAG.getNode(X86ISD::VPDPWSSD, DL, VT, Accum,
-                         concatSubVectors(Lo0, Hi0, DAG, DL),
-                         concatSubVectors(Lo1, Hi1, DAG, DL));
-    }
-  }
-
   // Fold ADD(ADC(Y,0,W),X) -> ADC(X,Y,W)
   if (Op0.getOpcode() == X86ISD::ADC && Op0->hasOneUse() &&
       X86::isZeroNode(Op0.getOperand(1))) {

diff  --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/vpdpwssd.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/vpdpwssd.ll
index ea97800505bc2..69a13e4555928 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/vpdpwssd.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/vpdpwssd.ll
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 ; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=znver4 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,AVX512VL-VNNI
 ; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=znver5 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,AVX-VNNI
 ; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=znver6 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,AVX-VNNI
-; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mattr=+avx512vnni,+fast-dpwssd | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,AVX512-VNNI
-; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mattr=+avx512vnni,+avx512vl,+fast-dpwssd | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,AVX512VL-VNNI
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mattr=+avx512vnni,+avx512bw,+fast-dpwssd | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,AVX512-VNNI
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mattr=+avx512vnni,+avx512bw,+avx512vl,+fast-dpwssd | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,AVX512VL-VNNI
 
 define <16 x i32> @vpdpwssd_test(<16 x i32> %0, <16 x i32> %1, <16 x i32> %2) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: vpdpwssd_test:


        


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list