[llvm] [AMDGPU] merge 16bit mov pairs in post-RA peephole (PR #208625)

Guo Chen via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 15 06:58:30 PDT 2026


================
@@ -763,6 +771,244 @@ MachineInstrBuilder SIPreEmitPeephole::createUnpackedMI(MachineInstr &I,
   return NewMI;
 }
 
+// Helper: extract the src operand and whether it is from the hi16 half.
+// Post-RA, both V_MOV_B16_t16_e32 and V_MOV_B16_t16_e64 use VGPR_16 dst
+// physical registers whose encoding already encodes hi/lo (IS_HI16 bit).
+void SIPreEmitPeephole::getMovB16Info(const MachineInstr &MI,
+                                      const SIRegisterInfo *TRI,
+                                      MCRegister &SrcReg16, bool &SrcIsVGPR,
+                                      MCRegister &SrcReg32, bool &SrcIsHi,
+                                      bool &SrcIsImm, int64_t &ImmVal) const {
+  SrcIsImm = false;
+  SrcIsHi = false;
+  SrcIsVGPR = false;
+  SrcReg16 = MCRegister();
+  SrcReg32 = MCRegister();
+
+  const MachineOperand *SrcOp = TII->getNamedOperand(MI, AMDGPU::OpName::src0);
+
+  if (SrcOp->isImm()) {
+    SrcIsImm = true;
+    ImmVal = SrcOp->getImm();
+    return;
+  }
+
+  SrcReg16 = SrcOp->getReg().asMCReg();
+  SrcIsVGPR = AMDGPU::VGPR_16RegClass.contains(SrcReg16);
+  if (SrcIsVGPR) {
+    SrcIsHi = AMDGPU::isHi16Reg(SrcReg16, *TRI);
+    SrcReg32 = TRI->get32BitRegister(SrcReg16);
+  } else {
+    SrcIsHi = false;
+    SrcReg32 = SrcReg16;
+  }
+}
+
+// clang-format off
+// Try to merge a pair of v_mov_b16 instructions targeting the lo16 and hi16
+// halves of the same VGPR into a single 32-bit instruction.
+//
+// Caller guarantee the pair to be two v_mov_b16 and targets the same dst32
+//
+// Patterns:
+//   v_mov_b16 v0.h, 0        v_mov_b16 v0.l, v2.l/s2  => v_and_b32  v0,0xffff,v2/s2
+//   v_mov_b16 v0.h, 0        v_mov_b16 v0.l, v2.h     => v_lshrrev_b32 v0,16,v2
+//   v_mov_b16 v0.l, 0        v_mov_b16 v0.h, v2.l/s2  => v_lshlrev_b32 v0,16,v2/s2
+//   v_mov_b16 v0.l, 0        v_mov_b16 v0.h, v2.h     => v_and_b32  v0,0xffff0000,v2
+//   v_mov_b16 v0.l, v.x/s    v_mov_b16 v0.h, v.y/s    => v_pack_b32_f16 v0, v/s, v/s
+// clang-format on
+bool SIPreEmitPeephole::mergeSingleMovB16Pair(MachineInstr &Lo,
+                                              MachineInstr &Hi,
+                                              bool IsHiFirst) const {
+  // Lo and Hi share the same Dst32
+  MCRegister LoDst = Lo.getOperand(0).getReg().asMCReg();
+  MCRegister Dst32 = TRI->get32BitRegister(LoDst);
+
+  // Extract source info for Lo and Hi.
+  MCRegister LoSrc16, LoSrc32, HiSrc16, HiSrc32;
+  bool LoSrcIsHi, HiSrcIsHi, LoSrcIsImm, HiSrcIsImm, LoSrcIsVGPR, HiSrcIsVGPR;
+  int64_t LoImm = 0, HiImm = 0;
+
+  getMovB16Info(Lo, TRI, LoSrc16, LoSrcIsVGPR, LoSrc32, LoSrcIsHi, LoSrcIsImm,
+                LoImm);
+  getMovB16Info(Hi, TRI, HiSrc16, HiSrcIsVGPR, HiSrc32, HiSrcIsHi, HiSrcIsImm,
+                HiImm);
+
+  MachineInstr &FirstMI = IsHiFirst ? Hi : Lo;
+  MachineInstr &SecondMI = IsHiFirst ? Lo : Hi;
+
+  bool DataConflictOnFirst = false, DataConflictOnSecond = false;
+
+  MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *Lo.getParent();
+
+  // Check that between Lo and Hi, there are no instructions that:
+  // - modify Dst32
+  // - modify LoSrc16 or HiSrc16 depending on order (data dependency)
+  // We scan from the instruction after the first mov up to (but not including)
+  // the second mov.
+  MCRegister FirstSrc16 = IsHiFirst ? HiSrc16 : LoSrc16;
+  MCRegister SecondSrc16 = IsHiFirst ? LoSrc16 : HiSrc16;
+  for (const MachineInstr &Scan :
+       drop_begin(make_range(FirstMI.getIterator(), SecondMI.getIterator()))) {
+
+    if (Scan.modifiesRegister(Dst32, TRI))
+      return false;
+    DataConflictOnFirst |=
+        (FirstSrc16 && Scan.modifiesRegister(FirstSrc16, TRI));
+    DataConflictOnSecond |=
+        (SecondSrc16 && Scan.modifiesRegister(SecondSrc16, TRI));
+    if (DataConflictOnFirst && DataConflictOnSecond)
+      return false;
+  }
+
+  MachineInstr &Selected = DataConflictOnSecond ? SecondMI : FirstMI;
+  const DebugLoc &DL = Selected.getDebugLoc();
+
+  // Now match patterns and emit the replacement instruction.
+  // Insert on Selected MI location, then remove both mov.
+
+  // Pattern: v_mov_b16 v0.l, v2.x/s2 + v_mov_b16 v0.h, v3.y/s3
+  //   => v_pack_b32_f16 v0,v2.x/s2,v3.y/s3
+  if (!HiSrcIsImm && !LoSrcIsImm) {
+    BuildMI(MBB, Selected, DL, TII->get(AMDGPU::V_PACK_B32_F16_t16_e64), Dst32)
+        .addImm(0) // SrcMod
+        .addReg(LoSrc16)
+        .addImm(0) // SrcMod
+        .addReg(HiSrc16)
+        .addImm(0)  // Clamp
+        .addImm(0); // Opsel
+    Lo.eraseFromParent();
+    Hi.eraseFromParent();
+    return true;
+  }
+
+  bool Usevop1 = AMDGPU::VGPR_32_Lo128RegClass.contains(Dst32) &&
+                 (LoSrcIsImm || (!LoSrcIsImm && LoSrcIsVGPR)) &&
+                 (HiSrcIsImm || (!HiSrcIsImm && HiSrcIsVGPR));
----------------
broxigarchen wrote:

I see it should check all reg op. done

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208625


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list