[llvm] [DAGCombiner] Fold extract_vector(get_active_lane_mask(), 0) to get_active_lane_mask (PR #208978)

[Usman Nadeem via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -598,4 +598,106 @@ if.end:
     ret void
 }
 
+; Test combining of getActiveLaneMask with extract_vector(idx=0) operations.
+
+define void @test_8bit_mask_with_32bit_index_and_trip_count(i32 %i, i32 %n) #0 {
+; CHECK-SVE-LABEL: test_8bit_mask_with_32bit_index_and_trip_count:
+; CHECK-SVE:       // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-SVE-NEXT:    whilelo p0.h, w0, w1
+; CHECK-SVE-NEXT:    // fake_use: $p0
+; CHECK-SVE-NEXT:    ret
+;
+; CHECK-SVE2p1-SME2-LABEL: test_8bit_mask_with_32bit_index_and_trip_count:
+; CHECK-SVE2p1-SME2:       // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-SVE2p1-SME2-NEXT:    whilelo p0.h, w0, w1
+; CHECK-SVE2p1-SME2-NEXT:    // fake_use: $p0
+; CHECK-SVE2p1-SME2-NEXT:    ret
+    %r = call <vscale x 16 x i1> @llvm.get.active.lane.mask.nxv16i1.i32(i32 %i, i32 %n)
+    %v0 = call <vscale x 8 x i1> @llvm.vector.extract.nxv8i1.nxv16i1.i64(<vscale x 16 x i1> %r, i64 0)
+    call void (...) @llvm.fake.use(<vscale x 8 x i1> %v0)
----------------
UsmanNadeem wrote:

I don't think so. I'll remove fake.use.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208978