[llvm] BPF: Fix misfolding subregisters (PR #208244)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Target/BPF/BPFMIPeephole.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/BPF/BPFMIPeephole.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/BPF/BPFMIPeephole.cpp
index 1d1bfe632..a440f12a3 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/BPF/BPFMIPeephole.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/BPF/BPFMIPeephole.cpp
@@ -275,12 +275,12 @@ bool BPFMIPeephole::eliminateZExt() {
       Register src = MI.getOperand(1).getReg();
       if (MI.getOperand(1).getSubReg() == BPF::sub_32) {
         BuildMI(MBB, MI, MI.getDebugLoc(), TII->get(BPF::COPY), dst)
-          .add(MI.getOperand(1));
+            .add(MI.getOperand(1));
       } else {
         // Build a SUBREG_TO_REG instruction.
         BuildMI(MBB, MI, MI.getDebugLoc(), TII->get(BPF::SUBREG_TO_REG), dst)
-          .addReg(src)
-          .addImm(BPF::sub_32);
+            .addReg(src)
+            .addImm(BPF::sub_32);
       }
 
       ToErase = &MI;

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208244