[lld] [LLD] [COFF] Remove a now incorrect comment in a test. NFC. (PR #190489)

[via llvm-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld

Author: Martin Storsjö (mstorsjo)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

This comment was added in 26572002749ee2e7d734e4e0aed4cca0e1c623c3 in 2018. Later in 8f540dad6120d00e3ad896b98cd32bcf00623ccd in 2020, the LLVM MC layer was adjusted to do essentially the same as GNU binutils do.

Therefore, I think that this test now technically could be done with object files generated by llvm-mc as well, instead of bundled binary object files.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190489.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) lld/test/COFF/gnu-weak.test (-3) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/lld/test/COFF/gnu-weak.test b/lld/test/COFF/gnu-weak.test
index 08e59734e0424..8e900eaa7e090 100644
--- a/lld/test/COFF/gnu-weak.test
+++ b/lld/test/COFF/gnu-weak.test
@@ -13,9 +13,6 @@ For each of the weak definitions, GNU tools produce a regular symbol
 named .weak.<weaksymbol>.<othersymbol>, where the other symbol name is
 another symbol defined close by.
 
-This can't be reproduced by assembling with llvm-mc, as llvm-mc always
-produces similar regular symbols named .weak.<weaksymbol>.default.
-
 The bundled object files can be produced from test code that looks like
 this:
 

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190489