[llvm] [VPlan] Simplify CanonicalIVIncrement unrolling (PR #185739)

[Florian Hahn via llvm-commits]

fhahn wrote:

> Ah, interesting! Thanks for the explanation: this makes me wonder if we made an error with directly unrolling Vector(End)Pointer? Will update this patch to move the scope_exit code to convertToConcreteRecipes.

Don't think so, although if easily done it would also be good to explicitly unroll Vector(End)Pointer I think, if it keeps things simple


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/185739