[llvm] [X86] remove unnecessary movs when %rdx is an input to mulx (PR #184462)

[Craig Topper via llvm-commits]

topperc wrote:

> > > I was thinking we'd better do it in a general way. But took a look at instructions, seems MULX is the only one that can commute operands with implicit register. So LGTM.
> > 
> > 
> > Doesn't the MUL/IMUL that produces a full product have the same issue? It multiplies AL/AX/EAX/RAX by another register or memory.
> 
> The 2addr pass handles it: https://godbolt.org/z/acrs67ffG. MULX is not a tranditional 2addr instruction.

That's not the instruction was I was referring to. I'm referring to the MUL that produces EDX:EAX or RDX:RAX result.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/184462