[llvm] [AMDGPU] IGroupLP: Refactor SchedGroup::initSchedGroup (NFC) (PR #184122)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUIGroupLP.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUIGroupLP.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUIGroupLP.cpp
index f92ada7e9..63bcb5c62 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUIGroupLP.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUIGroupLP.cpp
@@ -2692,7 +2692,8 @@ void IGroupLPDAGMutation::initSchedGroupBarrierPipelineStage(
   auto &SG = SyncedSchedGroups[SyncID].emplace_back((SchedGroupMask)SGMask,
                                                     Size, SyncID, DAG, TII);
   SG.add(*RIter);
-  SG.findCandidateSUnits(RIter, SG.DAG->SUnits.rend(), SyncedInstrs[SG.getSyncID()]);
+  SG.findCandidateSUnits(RIter, SG.DAG->SUnits.rend(),
+                         SyncedInstrs[SG.getSyncID()]);
 }
 
 bool IGroupLPDAGMutation::initIGLPOpt(SUnit &SU) {

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/184122