[llvm] [SDAG] Do not treat fp x!=0|y!=0 as special case in branch builder. (PR #180895)

[Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits]

================

----------------
arsenm wrote:

This should be concluded from the opcode, not the type. I didn't realize anything actually used the-not SETO/SETU comparisons with FP that ISDOpcodes documents. I've always found that very malformed, but didn't know where that was used. Can this change to stay in terms of the original IR compare type?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/180895