[llvm] [InstCombine] Optimise the expression `(C & A) | (select (C ^ true), B, false)` with `FoldOrOfAndsWithSelectToLogical` (PR #178438)

Rajveer Singh Bharadwaj via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 9 04:29:42 PST 2026


https://github.com/Rajveer100 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178438

>From c655f7a48f6e113b418d130e7e1b175af45a234a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rajveer <rajveer.developer at icloud.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 19:53:19 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [InstCombine] Optimise the expression `(C & A) | (select (C ^
 true), B, false)` with `FoldOrOfAndsWithSelectToLogical`

Resolves #174937

This simplification will help instcombine optimise the expression (and similar cases) to `select C, A, B`.
---
 .../InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp       | 56 ++++++++++++
 .../InstCombine/InstCombineInternal.h         |  2 +
 .../Transforms/InstCombine/select-and-or.ll   | 88 ++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp
index b4961105c72c2..9b563ea1d737b 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp
@@ -4023,6 +4023,47 @@ static Value *FoldOrOfSelectSmaxToAbs(BinaryOperator &I,
   return nullptr;
 }
 
+Instruction *
+InstCombinerImpl::FoldOrOfAndsWithSelectToLogical(BinaryOperator &I, Value *Op0,
+                                                  Value *Op1) {
+  Value *C, *A, *B;
+  // (C && A) | (select (C ^ true), B, false) => (C && A) | (!C && B)
+  // (C && A) | (select B, (C ^ true), false) => (C && A) | (B && !C)
+  // (A && C) | (select (C ^ true), B, false) => (A && C) | (!C && B)
+  // (A && C) | (select B, (C ^ true), false) => (A && C) | (B && !C) (may
+  // require freeze)
+  //
+  // => select C, A, B
+  if (match(Op1, m_c_LogicalAnd(m_Not(m_Value(C)), m_Value(B))) &&
+      match(Op0, m_c_LogicalAnd(m_Specific(C), m_Value(A)))) {
+    auto *SelInstOp0 = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(Op0);
+    auto *SelInstOp1 = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(Op1);
+
+    bool MayNeedFreeze = SelInstOp0 && SelInstOp1 &&
+                         match(SelInstOp0->getTrueValue(),
+                               m_Not(m_Specific(SelInstOp1->getTrueValue())));
+    if (MayNeedFreeze)
+      C = Builder.CreateFreeze(C);
+    if (!ProfcheckDisableMetadataFixes) {
+      Value *C2 = nullptr, *A2 = nullptr, *B2 = nullptr;
+      if (match(Op0, m_LogicalAnd(m_Specific(C), m_Value(A2))) && SelInstOp0) {
+        return SelectInst::Create(C, A, B, "", nullptr, SelInstOp0);
+      } else if (match(Op1, m_LogicalAnd(m_Not(m_Value(C2)), m_Value(B2))) &&
+                 SelInstOp1) {
+        SelectInst *NewSI =
+            SelectInst::Create(C, A, B, "", nullptr, SelInstOp1);
+        NewSI->swapProfMetadata();
+        return NewSI;
+      } else {
+        return createSelectInstWithUnknownProfile(C, A, B);
+      }
+    }
+    return SelectInst::Create(C, A, B);
+  }
+
+  return nullptr;
+}
+
 // FIXME: We use commutative matchers (m_c_*) for some, but not all, matches
 // here. We should standardize that construct where it is needed or choose some
 // other way to ensure that commutated variants of patterns are not missed.
@@ -4136,6 +4177,21 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::visitOr(BinaryOperator &I) {
     return BinaryOperator::CreateMul(X, IncrementY);
   }
 
+  // (C && A) | (select (C ^ true), B, false) => (C && A) | (!C && B)
+  // This can be further optimised to => select C, A, B
+  //
+  // Note: This is the logical version of a similar transformation handled
+  // in `foldSelectOfBools` except that it's a `select` instead of `or`.
+  if (Op0->hasOneUse() || Op1->hasOneUse()) {
+    if (Instruction *V = FoldOrOfAndsWithSelectToLogical(I, Op0, Op1)) {
+      return V;
+    }
+
+    if (Instruction *V = FoldOrOfAndsWithSelectToLogical(I, Op1, Op0)) {
+      return V;
+    }
+  }
+
   // (A & C) | (B & D)
   Value *A, *B, *C, *D;
   if (match(Op0, m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(C))) &&
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineInternal.h b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineInternal.h
index 8c8b300bb2002..e9ee4a69bc916 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineInternal.h
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineInternal.h
@@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY InstCombinerImpl final
   Instruction *visitSDiv(BinaryOperator &I);
   Instruction *visitFDiv(BinaryOperator &I);
   Value *simplifyRangeCheck(ICmpInst *Cmp0, ICmpInst *Cmp1, bool Inverted);
+  Instruction *FoldOrOfAndsWithSelectToLogical(BinaryOperator &I, Value *Op0,
+                                               Value *Op1);
   Instruction *visitAnd(BinaryOperator &I);
   Instruction *visitOr(BinaryOperator &I);
   bool sinkNotIntoLogicalOp(Instruction &I);
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-and-or.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-and-or.ll
index 0b8eda43beb18..0251e19be6d12 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-and-or.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/select-and-or.ll
@@ -789,6 +789,90 @@ define i1 @or_and2_commuted(i1 %a, i1 %b, i1 %c) {
   ret i1 %r
 }
 
+define i1 @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical1(i1 %a, i1 %b, i1 %c) !prof !0 {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical1(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[OR1:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i1 [[A:%.*]], i1 [[B:%.*]], !prof [[PROF1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[OR1]]
+;
+  %not = xor i1 %c, true
+  %and1 = and i1 %c, %a
+  %and2 = select i1 %not, i1 %b, i1 false, !prof !1
+  %or1 = or i1 %and1, %and2
+  ret i1 %or1
+}
+
+define i1 @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical2(i1 %a, i1 %b, i1 %c) !prof !0 {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical2(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[OR1:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i1 [[A:%.*]], i1 [[B:%.*]], !prof [[PROF2:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[OR1]]
+;
+  %not = xor i1 %c, true
+  %and1 = and i1 %c, %a
+  %and2 = select i1 %b, i1 %not, i1 false, !prof !1
+  %or1 = or i1 %and1, %and2
+  ret i1 %or1
+}
+
+define i1 @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical3(i1 %a, i1 %b, i1 %c) !prof !0 {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical3(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[OR1:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i1 [[A:%.*]], i1 [[B:%.*]], !prof [[PROF1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[OR1]]
+;
+  %not = xor i1 %c, true
+  %and1 = and i1 %a, %c
+  %and2 = select i1 %not, i1 %b, i1 false, !prof !1
+  %or1 = or i1 %and1, %and2
+  ret i1 %or1
+}
+
+define i1 @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical4(i1 %a, i1 %b, i1 %c) !prof !0 {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical4(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[OR1:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i1 [[A:%.*]], i1 [[B:%.*]], !prof [[PROF2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[OR1]]
+;
+  %not = xor i1 %c, true
+  %and1 = and i1 %a, %c
+  %and2 = select i1 %b, i1 %not, i1 false, !prof !1
+  %or1 = or i1 %and1, %and2
+  ret i1 %or1
+}
+
+define i1 @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical5(i1 %a, i1 %b, i1 %c) !prof !0 {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical5(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[OR1:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i1 [[A:%.*]], i1 [[B:%.*]], !prof [[PROF2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[OR1]]
+;
+  %not = xor i1 %c, true
+  %and1 = select i1 %a, i1 %c, i1 false, !prof !1
+  %and2 = and i1 %not, %b
+  %or1 = or i1 %and1, %and2
+  ret i1 %or1
+}
+
+define i1 @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical6(i1 %a, i1 %b, i1 %c) !prof !0 {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical6(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[OR1:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i1 [[A:%.*]], i1 [[B:%.*]], !prof [[PROF2]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[OR1]]
+;
+  %not = xor i1 %c, true
+  %and1 = select i1 %a, i1 %c, i1 false, !prof !1
+  %and2 = select i1 %b, i1 %not, i1 false, !prof !1
+  %or1 = or i1 %and1, %and2
+  ret i1 %or1
+}
+
+define i1 @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical7(i1 %a, i1 %b, i1 %c) !prof !0 {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @fold_or_of_ands_with_select_to_logical7(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[OR1:%.*]] = select i1 [[C:%.*]], i1 [[A:%.*]], i1 [[B:%.*]], !prof [[PROF1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[OR1]]
+;
+  %not = xor i1 %c, true
+  %and1 = and i1 %c, %a
+  %and2 = select i1 %not, i1 %b, i1 false, !prof !1
+  %or1 = or i1 %and2, %and1
+  ret i1 %or1
+}
+
 define i1 @or_and1_multiuse(i1 %a, i1 %b, i1 %c) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @or_and1_multiuse(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[NOTB:%.*]] = xor i1 [[B:%.*]], true
@@ -1356,8 +1440,10 @@ define i8 @test_logical_commuted_and_ne_a_b(i1 %other_cond, i8 %a, i8 %b)  {
 !0 = !{!"function_entry_count", i64 1000}
 !1 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 2, i32 3}
 ;.
-; CHECK: attributes #[[ATTR0:[0-9]+]] = { nocallback nofree nosync nounwind speculatable willreturn memory(none) }
+; CHECK: attributes #[[ATTR0:[0-9]+]] = { nocallback nocreateundeforpoison nofree nosync nounwind speculatable willreturn memory(none) }
+; CHECK: attributes #[[ATTR1:[0-9]+]] = { nocallback nofree nosync nounwind speculatable willreturn memory(none) }
 ;.
 ; CHECK: [[META0:![0-9]+]] = !{!"function_entry_count", i64 1000}
 ; CHECK: [[PROF1]] = !{!"branch_weights", i32 3, i32 2}
+; CHECK: [[PROF2]] = !{!"unknown", !"instcombine"}
 ;.



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list